Discussion:
[blfs-support] blfs systemd fails
spiky
2018-04-12 18:01:22 UTC
Permalink
Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied"


../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric
constant #define MS_MOVE 8192

../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first
use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’?
uint64_t flags = MS_REC;

I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's
from lfs systemd which it finished to build.

Is the issue because I,m building "chroot",  dont think thats a problem
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscri
Thanos Baloukas
2018-04-12 18:38:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by spiky
Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied"
../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric
constant #define MS_MOVE 8192
../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first
use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’?
uint64_t flags = MS_REC;
I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's
from lfs systemd which it finished to build.
Is the issue because I,m building "chroot",  dont think thats a problem
On the following mail

http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html

I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the
LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what
happened.
--
Thanos
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the ab
spiky
2018-04-12 19:52:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Thanos Baloukas
Post by spiky
Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied"
../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric
constant #define MS_MOVE 8192
../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first
use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’?
uint64_t flags = MS_REC;
I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's
from lfs systemd which it finished to build.
Is the issue because I,m building "chroot",  dont think thats a problem
On the following mail
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html
I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the
LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what
happened.
I dont have either libgpg or libgcrypt installed, so the error not
related to them
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/f
Thanos Baloukas
2018-04-13 05:51:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by spiky
Post by Thanos Baloukas
Post by spiky
Building systemd-238 fails with 3 errors "patch applied"
../src/basic/missing.h:528:17: error: expected identifier before numeric
constant #define MS_MOVE 8192
../src/shared/bus-unit-util.c:1073:42: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first
use in this function); did you mean ‘DT_REG’?
uint64_t flags = MS_REC;
I am building in chroot, to get past these errors I applied the sed's
from lfs systemd which it finished to build.
Is the issue because I,m building "chroot",  dont think thats a problem
On the following mail
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2018-April/034328.html
I sent an updated patch which included the header's fixes by the
LFS-systemd book, and Bruce replied that committed that. Not sure what
happened.
I dont have either libgpg or libgcrypt installed, so the error not
related to them
If you apply the patch attached to the above mail, the sed commands
by the LFS-book are not needed.
--
Thanos
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
Loading...